creekster |
09-05-2008 01:28 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cali Coug
(Post 261512)
Why is it curious to ask what she did as mayor? How many times did the Republicans trot out her time spent as mayor as experience that qualifies her for the presidency? If Republicans are going to play that card, then don't be surprised if people ask exactly what the experience entailed. She compared it to community organizer as a political cheap shot. I don't get the feeling that she intended the comparison to actually be a real comparison of duties. If it was, it was without substance.
|
SO you heard her compare it to a community organizer but because of the poke at the end you chose to ignore it as a cheap shot. OK. As you must agree, she was a mayor, and she fulfilled the duties. If you are so worked up about it, you can find the duties on line. Do you really contend that you have no idea what she did or that you even care? If this is the lynch pin for your assessment of her, I encourage you to look it up. The problem is that your comments here are also nothing more than political cheap shots, and you know it. Does her time as mayor prepare her to be vp/president? Perhaps, and certainly as much or more as being community organizer does, which I think is her point, and the point you keep ignoring. At least a mayor is elected (more than once in her case) and not just some sort of self-appointed title that one assumes.
Quote:
I did notice her base hasn't objected to any failings about her candidacy. You don't seem to mind, because you note that she is just going to be the VP who, in your words, "does pretty much nothing." What if she becomes president? Seriously? What do you know about her positions? I find it remarkable I have asked this question multiple times in multiple threads with nobody even attempting an answer. Do you want to take a shot at it? Feel free.
|
As you know, because I can tell you have good reading skills, my comment about the lack of a VP job description was in response to the great alarm you expressed that she was unable to define the VP's duties. That is not consequential, which is a point you apparently conceded here.
Do I know as much about her as I do about the other three? No. But it might help if the media (and I blame the media and not the dems, really) would spend some time analyzing her record as governor or even as mayor of tidy little Wasilla rahter than bleat on incessantly about her pregnant daughter. Her lack of experience concerns me, at least in areas of foreign policy. But so does Obamas and his lack of experience will be felt immediately and will not require his running mate's death to start affecting my life. SO it is a bit of a more immediate concern.
Quote:
We have about 9 weeks to go until election day. McCain has now spent 1 of those weeks sheltering Palin from all media interviews, and we know as little today about her policy positions as we did when she was announced. We know more about her family life, but I just don't care about that.
|
I care about her family life, at some level. Character does matter to me. Likje you, I also lament the lack of knowledge about her positions, but am certain that part of the reason is because she simply doesn't have positions on all national issues because she didn't expect to need to have them at this point. IOW, you can assume that on those topics her positions will pretty much be McCain's positions. It would not surprise me if you would find yourself disagreeing with those, btw.
|