Only brain dead attorneys? Your quote came BEFORE you even provided a survey.
Here is a quick summary for your review:
Tex makes broad, absurd claim.
Cali asks for proof.
Tex provides a cite, then says it proves what he claims.
Cali points out the citation supports a proposition much narrower than what Tex claims.
Tex then argues that what he meant to say (and what any smart person would think he meant to say) is exactly what the citation says.
Hard to ever be wrong if your claims constantly evolve to mean exactly whatever any evidence you can provide says, even if the evidence you provide doesn't actually support your original claim.
Let me try one:
All internet links go to cougarguard.com.
http://cougarguard.com
Click on the link above for proof.
See- all internet links go to cougarguard.com (and if you can't understand that I mean that only the link above goes to cougarguard.com, then you are braindead).
And your explanation about my analogy is what is poor here (and all you really do is reference someone else's explanation, though oddly not Indy Coug's).
