cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board

cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board (http://www.cougarguard.com/forum/index.php)
-   Politics (http://www.cougarguard.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   We're screwed (http://www.cougarguard.com/forum/showthread.php?t=25934)

Tex 05-29-2012 05:34 PM

This is what stupid looks like. Robert Gibbs on Face the Nation:

Quote:

... what Bain Capital never did was focus on job creation. That's not what Bain Capital does. It loads up companies with debt. It takes money out of those companies and pays those investors.
I don't mean that Gibbs is stupid--likely he's quite smart--but that he thinks the American electorate is stupid to buy this line.

No business sets out to create jobs. All businesses set out to make profit. They may have some little mission statement about helping kids, or saving whales, or whatever social good they want to do, but it is always about the bottom line in the end.

And no investment firm survives, much less prospers, by buying companies, loading them with debt, and then "taking out" the profit. This is so stupid it's amazing anyone says it with a straight face.

If Obama continues with this line throughout the election, he's punching Romney's ticket. The majority of voters are not this dumb.

MikeWaters 05-29-2012 07:07 PM

the stupid ones are voting for Obama anyway.

ute4ever 05-29-2012 07:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MikeWaters (Post 316341)
the stupid ones are voting for either Obama or Romney anyway. They actually think the two parties are quite different, and that switching the executive office from one to the other will somehow make a quantifiable difference.

Well said.

Tex 05-30-2012 01:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ute4ever (Post 316345)
Well said.

Who are the smart ones voting for?

Tex 05-30-2012 04:04 PM

The irony of Wisconsin is that after all the effort to recall senators, defeat Prosser, and recall Walker, which have either all failed or are expected to fail, the Democrats may have done Republicans a huge favor.

RNC Chairman Reince Priebus:

Quote:

"I don’t think there’s a state in the country where the GOP knows the voters better than Wisconsin… We’ve been analyzing this state for two and a half years. Contacting two and a half million voters, having all of that consumer data, the Prosser election, the state legislative recall challenges… You have a pattern here of success that is going to make it easier to win here in November.

“We’re not seeing any fatigue on our side at all. One of the biggest problems that the Democrats decent number of Democrats who tell pollsters and in focus groups, ‘we may not be Republicans, but we think this recall stuff is out of control. A legislative disagreement with Walker is not enough to have recall and spend millions of dollars on that.’ To many Democrats, this is absurd. That’s a problem in their turnout model that they don’t know what to do with.”
Bush lost Wisconsin in 2004 by 0.4%. The idea that Romney might potentially win it is nothing short of sheer awesomeness.

ute4ever 05-30-2012 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tex (Post 316347)
Who are the smart ones voting for?

Allow me to answer your question with a parable. Suppose all of the factions in the Nation of Islam agreed upon a President to govern their way of life, and is given the honorable title of "The Caliph." Then suppose there followed a worldwide election for one primary religious leader over the entire planet, a sort of Religious Head of State. Would you choose between "the only two that matter:" the Pope or the Caliph, or would you throw your vote away on Thomas S. Monson?

Archaea 05-30-2012 08:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ute4ever (Post 316353)
Allow me to answer your question with a parable. Suppose all of the factions in the Nation of Islam agreed upon a President to govern their way of life, and is given the honorable title of "The Caliph." Then suppose there followed a worldwide election for one primary religious leader over the entire planet, a sort of Religious Head of State. Would you choose between "the only two that matter:" the Pope or the Caliph, or would you throw your vote away on Thomas S. Monson?

I would vote for the Pope.

Tex 05-31-2012 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Archaea (Post 316355)
I would vote for the Pope.

I'm just curious which candidate is the Pope and which is the Caliph.

ute4ever 05-31-2012 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tex (Post 316358)
I'm just curious which candidate is the Pope and which is the Caliph.

I figured it would go over your head.

From President Uchtdorf:
Quote:

Perhaps there is no better laboratory to observe the sin of pride than the world of sports. I have always loved participating in and attending sporting events. But I confess there are times when the lack of civility in sports is embarrassing. How is it that normally kind and compassionate human beings can be so intolerant and filled with hatred toward an opposing team and its fans?

I have watched sports fans vilify and demonize their rivals. They look for any flaw and magnify it. They justify their hatred with broad generalizations and apply them to everyone associated with the other team. When ill fortune afflicts their rival, they rejoice.
If he had used political parties in his example instead of sporting rivals, I wonder if it would have made a lick of difference.
Both parties have their strong points and their weak points. Both have made great decisions and poor decisions. Sadly for you though, is that all of the jarring that you engaged with CaliCoug in 2008, only to have your party lose the election, seems to have cut you deep.

Tex 05-31-2012 06:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ute4ever (Post 316361)
I figured it would go over your head.

Well, you didn't actually answer the question.

Tex 06-01-2012 02:50 PM

You've probably heard already that unemployment is up to 8.2%.

Worse, here's the underlying job creation numbers for 2012:

Jan: 275K
Feb: 259K
Mar: 143K
Apr: 77K
May: 69K

So the entire country made just over enough new jobs to fill LES. Sheesh. And then comes word Obama may take on health care again in his 2nd term.

Heaven help us.

Tex 06-01-2012 10:26 PM

http://blog.american.com/wp-content/...rbernstein.jpg

http://blog.american.com/2012/06/mis...sion-red-zone/

Tex 06-06-2012 04:49 PM

"What Ed Schultz tweeted 18 minutes before MSNBC called the race for Scott Walker."

http://d3j5vwomefv46c.cloudfront.net...jDNJnUtehxTAQ_

MikeWaters 06-06-2012 06:50 PM

afterwards he said that Walker would soon be indicted, without apparently any further explanation or justification of his charge.

he's a complete horse's ass.

Tex 06-07-2012 06:15 PM

Jon Stewart, on Wisconsin.

Tex 06-13-2012 05:09 PM

Via PoliticalMath:

http://desmond.yfrog.com/Himg876/sca...=640&ysize=640

ute4ever 06-13-2012 07:09 PM

Here's another parable.

There is a boy named Tex who loves the Dallas Cowboys, especially their starting QB George. In the 14th game of the season, George has a good first quarter and the Cowboys take a 7-3 lead. Unfortunately, during the second and third quarters, George throws four interceptions and fumbles the ball twice, and the Cowboys trail 52-10 with only 15 minutes to go.

The coach kept George in the game during those disastrous quarters because his second, third, and fourth string QBs were all injured or MIA.

On the first play of the fourth quarter, George fumbles a third time while on his own 5 yard line. The coach decides he's seen enough and puts in the ever popular Uncle Rico, who only has high school experience but is a big hit with the fans, who are chanting his name.

The opposing team drives 5 yards for a 59-10 lead, and Tex stands and yells "you suck Uncle Rico!"

Uncle Rico completes his first five passes, but finishes with an average outing, leading the Cowboys to two field goals while the other team scores another TD, for a final score of 66-16.

Now it's time for the coach to decide who to start the 15th game: Uncle Rico or George. While campaigning for George, Tex offers the following:

--Uncle Rico is the worst QB in team history because never before did the Cowboys give up 66 points.

--Uncle Rico is the worst QB in team history because never before did the Cowboys lose by 50.

--Uncle Rico's offense was outscored during his tenure.

--Only two plays after George was yanked, Uncle Rico's Cowboys gave up another TD.

--Uncle Rico had fewer completed passes than George.

--When Uncle Rico fumbled the ball after only four minutes, that ratio was worse than George, who averaged only one fumble every fifteen minutes

--Uncle Rico failed to win the game 53-52. The final score is entirely due to his lack of competence.

--Two fatigued offensive linemen and two equally fatigued wide receivers were injured during plays while Uncle Rico was in the pocket. Those injuries are entirely Uncle Rico's fault.

--During the fourth quarter, Cowboys Stadium was at only 30% capacity, unlike the first quarter when it was at 100% capacity. It's Uncle Rico's fault that fewer concessions were purchased in the fourth quarter.

To be continued.

Tex 06-15-2012 02:20 PM

I'm trying to tamp down my enthusiasm for this cycle since it's only June, but this is just funny. The press panned his speech yesterday, which this video lampoons.



Obama seems to have truly lost his mojo.

PS. One more:



All times are GMT. The time now is 09:17 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.