cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board

cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board (http://www.cougarguard.com/forum/index.php)
-   Fitness and Wellness (http://www.cougarguard.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=32)
-   -   Can you boost metabolism? (http://www.cougarguard.com/forum/showthread.php?t=19612)

Solon 05-21-2008 11:08 PM

Can you boost metabolism?
 
I'm participating in a research study where yesterday they calculated the amount of calories my body burns at rest by having me breathe into a little helmet-tent, and then measuring the amount of carbon dioxide.

According to the research nurse, someone of my height and weight should require about 1750 calories a day just to keep the vital organs going. My test results, though, indicate that I only burn about 1430 calories a day resting. (And, I'm not in starvation mode. I don't eat a lot, but I eat fine.)

In a way, I'm a marvel of evolution, since my body is geared to get by on fewer calories. On the other hand, I'd rather burn a few more so I can lose 5 or have a little ice cream. Can you boost metabolism naturally (no caffeine or energy supplements)? Fartlek training maybe?

hyrum 05-21-2008 11:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Solon (Post 223970)
I'm participating in a research study where yesterday they calculated the amount of calories my body burns at rest by having me breathe into a little helmet-tent, and then measuring the amount of carbon dioxide.

According to the research nurse, someone of my height and weight should require about 1750 calories a day just to keep the vital organs going. My test results, though, indicate that I only burn about 1430 calories a day resting. (And, I'm not in starvation mode. I don't eat a lot, but I eat fine.)

In a way, I'm a marvel of evolution, since my body is geared to get by on fewer calories. On the other hand, I'd rather burn a few more so I can lose 5 or have a little ice cream. Can you boost metabolism naturally (no caffeine or energy supplements)? Fartlek training maybe?

Drink ice water.
It takes quite a few calories to warm water up to 98.6 from, say, 35.

Archaea 05-22-2008 12:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Solon (Post 223970)
I'm participating in a research study where yesterday they calculated the amount of calories my body burns at rest by having me breathe into a little helmet-tent, and then measuring the amount of carbon dioxide.

According to the research nurse, someone of my height and weight should require about 1750 calories a day just to keep the vital organs going. My test results, though, indicate that I only burn about 1430 calories a day resting. (And, I'm not in starvation mode. I don't eat a lot, but I eat fine.)

In a way, I'm a marvel of evolution, since my body is geared to get by on fewer calories. On the other hand, I'd rather burn a few more so I can lose 5 or have a little ice cream. Can you boost metabolism naturally (no caffeine or energy supplements)? Fartlek training maybe?

tell us what you find. I heard exercise helps one burn extra calories. As far as boosting your natural burn, we'd have to inquire with the physicians on board.

bigpiney 05-22-2008 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Solon (Post 223970)
I'm participating in a research study where yesterday they calculated the amount of calories my body burns at rest by having me breathe into a little helmet-tent, and then measuring the amount of carbon dioxide.

According to the research nurse, someone of my height and weight should require about 1750 calories a day just to keep the vital organs going. My test results, though, indicate that I only burn about 1430 calories a day resting. (And, I'm not in starvation mode. I don't eat a lot, but I eat fine.)

In a way, I'm a marvel of evolution, since my body is geared to get by on fewer calories. On the other hand, I'd rather burn a few more so I can lose 5 or have a little ice cream. Can you boost metabolism naturally (no caffeine or energy supplements)? Fartlek training maybe?

aren't you fairly athletic? I would have expected you too burn more than that. Weren't you going out and running in the freezing cold? or was that someone else. Maybe your metabolism said screw this and is taking the year off. I would if you made be go out and run in the cold.

It seems to me the more active you are the more your base metabolism rises, because your body gets conditioned to burning calories and just keeps on doing it even when you stop activity. maybe their methods for measurements aren't really as good as they thought they were and you use your oxygen more efficiently and thus skew the results.

MikeWaters 05-22-2008 03:43 PM

You are pretty skinny and don't have a ton of lean muscle mass. Put on more muscle and you will boost your metabolism.

creekster 05-22-2008 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MikeWaters (Post 224100)
You are pretty skinny and don't have a ton of lean muscle mass. Put on more muscle and you will boost your metabolism.

ISn't that different? You are suggesting he add mass to increase the amount of calories consumed. He is asking abotu increasing his metabolic rate (the set point theory stuff) as I understand it. Adding muscle will clearly allow consumption of more claories. Changing the metabolic rate is iffy, based on what I have read.

MikeWaters 05-22-2008 04:32 PM

I didn't say my opinion was scientific. It was just my opinion. Add muscle mass, increase metabolism.

Solon 05-22-2008 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigpiney (Post 224060)
aren't you fairly athletic? I would have expected you too burn more than that. Weren't you going out and running in the freezing cold? or was that someone else. Maybe your metabolism said screw this and is taking the year off. I would if you made be go out and run in the cold.

It seems to me the more active you are the more your base metabolism rises, because your body gets conditioned to burning calories and just keeps on doing it even when you stop activity. maybe their methods for measurements aren't really as good as they thought they were and you use your oxygen more efficiently and thus skew the results.

LOL.

I don't know if I would call myself "althletic," but I do run a lot and am in very good cardiovascular shape (resting heart-rate is around 50). That's why I was so stumped.

Archaea 05-22-2008 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Solon (Post 224154)
LOL.

I don't know if I would call myself "althletic," but I do run a lot and am in very good cardiovascular shape (resting heart-rate is around 50). That's why I was so stumped.

Mike hit upon something I had forgotten. Adding muscle mass will increase caloric burn.

Runner Coug 05-22-2008 06:46 PM

I've heard a meth addiction will raise your metabolism substantially. If you're ok with paranoia, hallucinations, aggression and open sores, you could try that.

creekster 05-22-2008 06:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Archaea (Post 224157)
Mike hit upon something I had forgotten. Adding muscle mass will increase caloric burn.

whilke a good thing, that doesn't up the metabolism.

Archaea 05-22-2008 06:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by creekster (Post 224251)
whilke a good thing, that doesn't up the metabolism.

I don't really understand what metabolism actually is, so you're probably correct.

Solon 05-29-2008 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Runner Coug (Post 224248)
I've heard a meth addiction will raise your metabolism substantially. If you're ok with paranoia, hallucinations, aggression and open sores, you could try that.

That doesn't sound too bad. It might actually improve my appearance and disposition.

Spaz 05-29-2008 05:21 PM

Changing the number of calories your body burns at rest, and increasing metabolism, are two different things, IMO.

If you want to "lose 5 or maybe have a little ice cream", you simply need to increase the number of calories you burn each day while maintaining your current calorie intake (if that makes sense).


I believe it's normal for a fit person to burn fewer calories at rest than is average, due to the natural decreased heart-rate and other streamlining effects of being fit...

marsupial 05-29-2008 05:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spaz (Post 226345)
I believe it's normal for a fit person to burn fewer calories at rest than is average, due to the natural decreased heart-rate and other streamlining effects of being fit...

Fit people burn less calories resting because their bodies are more efficient?

I always thought increasing your muscle mass increases you metabolism as well. Muscle, I thought, required more calories to maintain than fat.

Spaz 05-29-2008 05:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marsupial (Post 226352)
Fit people burn less calories resting because their bodies are more efficient?

I always thought increasing your muscle mass increases you metabolism as well. Muscle, I thought, required more calories to maintain than fat.

Certainly, at rest a fit person's heart-rate can regularly be as much as half that of an unfit person. IIRC, the heart is the biggest at-rest calorie burner in the body.


Absolutely, many places claim muscle burns more calories than fat. It stands to reason that at rest, muscle burns few calories, and the difference is marginal.

Spaz 05-29-2008 05:56 PM

Then again, I may be completely wrong...

Here's a pretty good list of ways to boost metabolism. Note that it says you should INCREASE caloric intake (obviously depending on your current level).

Spaz 05-29-2008 06:17 PM

Another common thing to boost the burn is to drink lots of water.

SteelBlue 05-29-2008 07:46 PM

Here's a study that concludes that "...weight training induces a significant increase in average daily metabolic rate."

http://jap.physiology.org/cgi/content/full/82/1/298

ERCougar 05-31-2008 03:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SteelBlue (Post 226420)
Here's a study that concludes that "...weight training induces a significant increase in average daily metabolic rate."

http://jap.physiology.org/cgi/content/full/82/1/298

I think a better study would be to have the control group spend an equivalent amount of time on aerobic activities. Interesting study though.


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:43 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.