Goatnapper'96 |
01-19-2007 03:13 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Archaea
(Post 54691)
He gives some doozies.
The talk he gave years ago about the need to glorify awful poetry, the need not to tell negative stories and the recent silly song. What is his angle?
Elder Bednar's story glorifying the HC is also weird. I understand his point but still felt uneasy about it.
|
You know after lamblasting aaron, who is very much the colloquial equivalent of an anal orifice, the reality was aaron was right. Elder Packer is one of the Lord's annointed, but I doubt I would have been singing the root-te-te-toot song. It is gay.
Elder Packer represents the conservative side of the Church. I often think that God works his own form of representative democracy. Some of you questioning intellectuals get your Talmage's or Pres. David O. McKay's, while the rank and file get their Pres. Joseph Fielding Smith and Elder Boyd K. Packers. I really have no issues with Elder Packer's opinion on Church history. I can understand where he comes from and understand his logic. I just happen to personally disagree. Ours is trully a large tent.....
I don't know how many of you have read Leonard Arrington's "Adventures of a Church Historian," but it really gives some insight into how decisions are often made by the Brethren. Namely that in a great number of issues there is often disagreement, but usually the side that "wins" is the one where its proponents are the most emotionally "fully invested" into bringing their opinions to "higher level of execution." Often out of professional courtesy those opposed will wilt in the name of unity.
I am in interested in if some of you think Elder Packer would have issues with how Tim Tebow's girlfriend dresses.......
|