SeattleUte |
07-20-2007 03:37 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Swarthout
(Post 103726)
|
Wow. Thanks for this. The quotations in the non-apologetic review are very interesting as is the summary of the book. I may have to break down and buy this book. If anybody wants an empiricist's best estimate of how Joseph Smith wrote the Book of Mormon, this book endeavors to provide it. The quotations in the article show impressive insight and attention to the evidence.
The FARMS article is not worth reading. I scanned it, confirming FARMS is playing its usual role as LDS intellectual brown shirts. The article is 47 pages long and amounts to nothing more than a whole lot of heated argument, assertions and name calling, for example, asserting that the B of A papyrus fragment didn't contain the portion Joseph translated and calling Palmer "one sided" for not considering this view. I'd say the lady doth protest too much. Whether or not Joseph Smith was a fraudster (clearly Palmer believes he at least deluded himself into believing he saw Christ, angels and gold plates when no such thing actually happened), it's clear that FARMS has no regard for empirical truth, i.e., they are deliberate spinners of lies and purveyers of fraud. But I guess like lawyers and lobbyists for cigarette companies they too must earn a living.
I highly recommend folks here at least read the quotations from Palmer's book in the non-apologetic review.
|