Quote:
Originally Posted by Chapel-Hill-Coug
Now you aren't saying Stendahl sees the BOM as an *ancient* targum are you? He is clear in an article related to this talk that he sees the KJV version of the bible as the source of this targumic expansion (a chapter in one of Truman Madsen's books that I can't remember off hand). He therefore sees the BOM as a 19th century document worthy of exegesis. If this was already assumed in your post then forgive me. I just wanted to clarify that in no way does Stendahl see the BOM as an ancient document.
|
Amen. We may yet save Chino's soul.
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be.
—Paul Auster
|