Quote:
Originally Posted by Sleeping in EQ
Was there evidence of reading comprehension? No. Was there evidence of reading? No. For better or worse, I made one little comment and then got out of the way. It's a shame because two weeks ago the discussion of Romans was decent (considering that expecting to meaningfully discuss all of Romans in 40 minutes is absurd from the start).
|
We're behind you guys in terms of lesson #, but I think our experiences this week in class were similar. It's often pretty clear that the instructor hasn't read anything but random chunks of the lesson manual. It's too bad, because a lot of the class's questions are fairly easily addressed by reading before/after the selected passage, but the instructor hasn't looked. Makes for awkward fidgeting as the instructor tries to transition to the next bullet point in the manual.