Quote:
Originally Posted by Solon
Aaah, Indy - you rose to the bait too easily.
Of course, the non-profit LDS church wouldn't tell people what their political opinions should be . . . no . . .never. That would conflict with the church's non-profit status.
LDS leaders just want the members to "express themselves." Sure, as long as their expressions don't conflict with what they want.
Ask Jeff Nielsen, a BYU adjunct professor who "expressed himself" in the form of an op-ed that appeared in the Salt Lake Tribune on June 4, 2006. Nielsen considered an amendment against gay marriage immoral - completely in accordance with his training in ethics as a prof. of philosophy.
Although I'm too cheap to buy the archived version of Nielsen's op-ed from the Trib., you can get the gist of it through the story originally reported by the SL Tribune, available at http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1649439/posts
Nielsen was terminated by the BYU philosophy department, his termination letter reading in part, "Since you have chosen to contradict and oppose the church in an area of great concern to church leaders . . . in a public forum."
http://www.exmormon.org/mormon/mormon449.htm
Granted, Hinckley didn't fire this guy, but the significance stems from the fact that everyone seems to have been able to read between the lines, while the church maintained plausible deniability that it ever "told" someone how to vote.
Clever. |
I don't know that it is as sinister as you suggest. I suspect The Church saw encouraging members to vote on this particular issue as a fairly safe endeavor. Sure there would be a few that would vote counter to The Church's wishes, but most would vote "correctly," not because The Church instructed them to do so, but because they honestly felt it was the correct thing to do.
While related, Nielsen's editorial and subsequent not being picked up by BYU, is a different matter. By promoting his position (on any matter) that was counter to the sponsoring organization of the university, didn't he violate his contract, or at least make himself much less employable by the university?
I would agree that by encouraging members to vote on something, it is fairly clear which way The Church hopes they vote. But it is not an order accompanied by punitive action if one fails to obey.