Quote:
Originally Posted by Archaea
I didn't miss that, but I imagine many who learn of that will miss that distinction.
You think an impairment in one's ability to drive the vehicle had no impact upon the accident? Maybe not, but the presumptions won't run in his favor.
|
I do think an impairment in one's ability to drive a vehicle can have an impact. Of course, the 99+ other drivers that I'm assuming were unimpaired didn't seem to fare any better than the drunk that was impaired. He shouldn't have been driving drunk either way. Period.
You seem to be assuming he was car #1 in the accident? How do you know he wasn't car #86 out of 100+?