Quote:
Originally Posted by Cali Coug
These are complaints about every single candidate for the presidency now running except for Romney and Huckabee (who are from states that you don't consider as states that provide the necessary leadership experience you would hope for).
And what do you deem to be a "significant legislative reform?" Something you agree with?
You are being pretty selective in determining what type of leadership counts and what doesn't, and you aren't applying the analysis equally to all candidates which leads me to believe you are just reacting emotionally against Hillary and Obama.
You really went out of your way to note that you have a lesbian friend. How is that helpful here? My gay transexual black cousin's roomate's friend likes Hillary.
And no matter how many times you say that a successful president has to have executive leadership, you still haven't shown me any evidence of that at all, nor have you even bothered to explain why the 4 governors since Ford do not rank as the 4 best presidents (which we would expect) since FDR.
|
Mass is a middle tier state that was in the red but now is in the black. That is significant.
Huckabee's state is less than middle tier so perhaps he's underqualified.
The point is about my friend that even she recognizes Hillary has weaknesses. A supporter acknowledges she may be a liability in this matter. I hadn't even conceived of that criticism.
You tell me what significant legislation we owe to Hillary. I don't know what she's sponsored. Has she sponsored significant trade legislation?
Tax legislation?
Economic regulations?
She tried to ramrail our health care during Bill's presidency and thank you it didn't succeed. I don't want French healthcare.
What strengths does she have other her promise to tax the shit out of us and to give us an even more involved governmentally controlled economy and health care system?
What significant goals does she have for foreign policy? Let me guess, NOT BE BUSH. What a concept. That's the Dem's mantra: "We're not Bush."
Big deal.
But we do want Kyoto accords to raise the price of production here. Great, increased prices.
Increases in prices, decreased production, affirmative action, increased taxes, give over sovereignty to UN and what else?