Quote:
Originally Posted by woot
Obviously he does matter, or he wouldn't be mentioned constantly by the ignorant. Al Gore is dead wrong about a great many things, and his share of the Nobel prize is a travesty, but much of the derision he receives is from those who have no clue what exactly he is wrong about, and mock him for false reasons or as a generic "liberal" punching bag. He is a man who has accomplished much, but whose accomplishments are ignored because of the regrettably poor way in which he communicates, and the threat he poses to those who endeavor to avoid facing certain facts.
Those who mock him are often those who are far more wrong on environmental issues than Gore is. Gore exaggerates the facts, while his critics tend to ignore the facts entirely. Which is worse?
|
Well the conservatives have Richard Lindzen, MIT professor, and the liberal wacko alarmists have Al Gore, you decide which person has more credibility.