View Single Post
Old 06-06-2006, 03:16 PM   #21
creekster
Senior Member
 
creekster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: the far corner of my mind
Posts: 8,711
creekster is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hoyacoug
You are starting to sound a bit like Bill Clinton! It depends on what your definition of "a" is.

According to dictionary.com:

"A"- Used before nouns and noun phrases that denote a single but unspecified person or thing: a region; a person.

Key words being "a single."
Even if this is true, nothing in the proposed language prohibits a series of simultaneous marriages as long as each one is between a man and a woman.

For the record, however, I don't think that the First PResidency is likely to be relying on this sort of lawyer-ish interpretational technique to take the position that it has. Instead, I think it is more likely that they are urging support for broader reasons.
__________________
Sorry for th e tpyos.
creekster is offline   Reply With Quote