Quote:
Originally Posted by Cali Coug
Because the concept of one man one woman in a marriage is just as easily viewed as one person marrying one person. The total number of participants in the marriage is identical in both scenarios. Why do you assume logically that changing the characteristics of the people involved in the marriage necessitates allowing a change in the number of participants too?
|
SO what? Why is the number of particapnts meaningful? If anything, it is LESS meaningful than the gender of the partiicapnts, and yet you are conmfrotbale hanging your hat on this characterisitc but not on gender? THis makes no sense to me.