View Single Post
Old 07-05-2008, 03:20 PM   #32
TripletDaddy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 9,483
TripletDaddy can only hope to improve
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueK View Post
Energy Solutions Arena was not publicly financed. LHM paid for it. One reason it was done that way was to make it harder for a new owner to move the team. It's much easier to move a team if it isn't financially tied to the arena.
LHM used RDA funds to help pay for the land. He didnt pay for it all himself. The building was privately financed through some of his own cash and then mostly loans (not uncommon).

I believe there were bonds involved because towards the late 90s, LHM had ot refinance and at the time, S&P gave the investment a really high rating for a sports team. Possibly the highest one of any sports refinancing.

I still think ESA does not fall under SU's model, though, since, again, bonds are financing, not subsidy.
__________________
Fitter. Happier. More Productive.

"Everyone is against me. Everyone is fawning for 3D's attention and defending him." -- SeattleUte
TripletDaddy is offline   Reply With Quote