View Single Post
Old 08-18-2008, 09:06 PM   #101
MikeWaters
Demiurge
 
MikeWaters's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,365
MikeWaters is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sleeping in EQ View Post
I don't think so. My understanding is that the genetics is much more complicated than "finding a gay gene." I think it's more likely that a variety of genetic attributes (please forgive my imprecise language) will be found to contribute to sexuality.
A certain contribution will be genetic (complex, not a single gene). A certain contribution will be from in utero environmental exposure (mother's hormone milieu, infection, mother's immune response, placenta, etc), and then a certain percentage will be post-birth measurable environmental exposure (chemicals, toxins, formula feed, etc). And then a percentage will be more complex, more difficult to understand and measure environmental factors.

Ironically, the formulation above is the same formulation used in describing complex "unsolved" diseases, like schizophrenia.
MikeWaters is offline   Reply With Quote