Quote:
Originally Posted by creekster
Compulsory? Or do you mean self-serving? Why is this different than a politician ('non-beleiver') giving $ to his pet cause? SHould we discount that due to its self-serving nature? Or if the donation is based on fervetn beleif, why is it different than anyone giving to a cause in which they fervently believe? This dichotomy is false.
|
It seems a little different when one's eternal well-being is affected.