Quote:
Originally Posted by tooblue
So, when the Boy Scouts of Canada were forced by the courts to permit a gay man to organize a troop that is not relevant? You mean when the man cited discrimination and used the legalization of Gay marriage to bolster his case that is not relevant?
And the fact that once Boys Scouts of Canada removed all prohibitions the Gay man NEVER formed a troop because his ONLY purpose for suing was to to advance the gay agenda that's fear mongering?
How about the fact that the church in Canada nearly eliminated Scouting completely due to the ruling -- that's not relevant?
|
tooblue, stick to drawing bananas. No, it is not relevant.
The Boy Scouts are not protected under the First Amednment like religions are protected.
The Church dropped the boy scouts (an unrelated entity) because it didnt want to have gay scoutmasters, not because there was a risk of the Church being forced to perform gay marriages as part of its religious practice. The Church cannot control how the BSA is operated, so it chose to disassociate.