Quote:
Originally Posted by Archaea
This is absurd, and you know it Cali.
It is one thing for a statute to be determined unconstitutional when it is viewed against the existing Constitution. That is what we expect of our highest reviewing jurists.
It is quite another thing for these jurists to declare that changes duly adopted are unconstitutional as compared to some nebulous "higher law" constitution, one unwritten except in the minds of the all powerful jurists.
They are creating bullshit out of thin air because they don't like the results of the elections to change the Constitution. Bullshit, but bullshit walks in California.
|
Historically, when the highest law of the land usurps natural law, there are generally two means of recourse:
1. Bring new laws
2. Bring revolution
America is strong, but jurists doing things like this will cause some creaking in the joints.