Quote:
Originally Posted by Venkman
except Cali
|
And the judge, apparently.
Why be skeptical of some of the creditors' claims? They say they should get money first. Who would ever think they would be anything but 100% honest in their arguments? We don't actually need to have any idea as to the merits of their claims- the fact is, they said they should get paid first, so it must be true! Right? And if the judge disagrees, it is because the fix is in! And if anyone disagrees with the creditors, it is because they are naive and puppets of Obama!
It is all so obvious when I write it out.