Quote:
Originally Posted by Cali Coug
Yes, I did note the concurring opinion. I didn't say they would try to defend it on the grounds of originalism, I said it isn't defensible on the grounds of originalism (a point which is true whether or not they tried to do it).
|
Heh. You didn't read it first, did you.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cali Coug
My argument on originalism, by the way, isn't that "originalism isn't perfect, ergo it's results-oriented." I am pretty confident you already know that, given that "we're retreading old discussions" here, so I will chalk this up as a dishonest attack and move on.
|
Chalk it up to whatever you want, that's exactly how I view your position.
__________________
"Have we been commanded not to call a prophet an insular racist? Link?"
"And yes, [2010] is a very good year to be a Democrat. Perhaps the best year in decades ..."
- Cali Coug
"Oh dear, granny, what a long tail our puss has got."
- Brigham Young
|