View Single Post
Old 03-07-2021, 09:48 PM   #2
MikeWaters
Demiurge
 
MikeWaters's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,365
MikeWaters is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

I spoke to “friend” about the documentary. It turns out he owns some documents and such from Hofmann. Interesting to get his thoughts, he said the documentary was well done. He mentions that Hugh W. Pinnock, whose picture can be seen in the documentary, was a likely a central figure that was not discussed in the documentary, when it comes to Hofmann’s contact with the church. Pinnock met with Hofmann on the day of the bombings.

https://www.nytimes.com/1985/10/22/u...d-on-loan.html

Why didn’t Hofmann participate in the documentary? Wouldn’t it have appealed to his ego? Friend says that Hoffman has never granted interviews with anyone after speaking to the parole board. He speculates that Hofmann came to the conclusion that his statement to the parole board was harmful to his desires (to be released), hence he has had no interest in doing anything that could be harmful to his getting out in the future.
MikeWaters is offline   Reply With Quote