Quote:
Originally Posted by Detroitdad
The legalese is mesmerizing.
Surely interfering with another's fundamental liberty to direct or participate in certain rights ought to be taboo (clear to me at least).
|
Devil is in the details there. What "rights" are we talking about here that you would discribe as a "fundamental liberty." And when you use that phrase, do you mean in the constitutional sense or in the "nature law" or "inalienable rights" sense? Just trying to understand what you mean.