View Single Post
Old 08-20-2005, 05:48 AM   #22
SeattleUte
 
SeattleUte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
SeattleUte has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeWaters
It's less controversial that I originally thought. It more implies that if someone seems to be troubled by it, they ought not do it.....nowhere there does it say to ask about it.
Here are the parts I focused on:

"Married persons should understand that if in their marital relations they are guilty of unnatural, impure, or unholy practices, they should not enter the temple unless and until they repent and discontinue any such practices. . . . The First Presidency [including Gordon B. Hinckley] has interpreted oral sex as constituting an unnatural, impure, or unholy practice."

- Official Declaration of the First Presidency of the Church - Including Gordon B. Hinckley, January 5th, 1982

Sounds pretty unequivocal to me.
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be.

—Paul Auster
SeattleUte is offline   Reply With Quote