Quote:
Originally Posted by Archaea
Juanita Brooks didn't believe that, and she was objective. You might believe McMurtry is not objective, but the McMurtry approach appears more scholarly than most.
Point to me an objective historian who is certain BY ordered and knew of the murders.
|
Will Bagley's MMM commentary on the PBS special was interesting. He basically implied there is enough circumstantial evidence to support the premise that BY was involved. I understand that Bagley is a member; how does he fit into the "objective historian" category?