http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/201...ong/index.html
Why should Armstrong be held up as a paragon of virtue, and triumph of the will, while his competitors derides as cheats IF IN FACT Armstrong was ALSO CHEATING?
Yet, he defenders would have us believe that all the top guys in cycling were cheating, except for him, and somehow he managed to top them all.
OK.
It's interesting to see what the power of subpoena and and threat of perjury does.