Quote:
Originally Posted by Solon
I didn't mean to criticize people who are interested, or who like to make connections. It is interesting - and (I'll admit) the BoM parallels are the first thing I thought about when I heard about double documents. But I think it's a bad idea for the Lee liberry to display it as somehow related to and possibly supporting historically the BoM.
|
And I better understand your argument. To restate it, because the linkage is not according to academic standards, namely, we don't have proof of it for seventh century Hebrews, it shouldn't be seen as evidence that Hebrews such as Lehi is supposed to be, have used double documents or sealed books. And because the Lee Library is an academic library it should be managed according to academic standards.