Quote:
Originally Posted by Tex
I provided a link to backup my contention. Your inability to do the same is not my problem.
I don't know why Clinton chose to campaign in Utah, but the LDS church does not engage in politics (at a candidate/party level), thus rendering your comparison flawed.
I've not conceded anything. The exception is the political category, as I noted before. You really should learn to read whole paragraphs.
That such efforts have been criticized underlies their reasons for not doing what you are criticizing them for.
|
Your link didn't back up your contention. In fact, you admitted as such, then you made a new contention. It IS your problem that your data doesn't support your statement. I haven't made any such statements. If you can't support your statement, don't blame me for not supporting it for you.
If you haven't conceded anything, then I eagerly await proof that blacks vote more as a demographic than ANY OTHER DEMOGRAPHIC, including, as you noted, religion, age and race. Good hunting.
I really enjoy your claim that the Republicans aren't doing more with blacks because they have been criticized. Classic. Who knew they were such a sensitive bunch? Isn't there a kids story about a sensitive elephant?