Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Lebowski
I like you, SU, but you are really going off the deep end lately. Over-the-top statements like this do nothing for your credibility. This is the stuff one would expect in the nuttiest anti-mormon literature. Not from our well-educated friend from Seattle.
|
I agree with this comment.
As a case in point to show how nutty it is, remember the Book of Alma, where the spiritual judge was separated from the legal, secular judgment? That is in effect a model for Republican form of government.
I doubt seriously any earnest GA, currently serving desires theological law to supplant the secular law, in all but a few instances. I doubt and challenge you to back it up, Seattle, that a single, currently serving GA, has advocated secular law be changed to outlaw adultery or fornication.
The Church has enough trials advising its membership let alon implementing religious law amongst the secular. An absurd allegation.