I understand his arguments but believe there are holes in some of his theories. Additionally, he comes from Princeton which promotes a distinctly neo-Keynesian based macro-economics theory. He is also biased in that he advises Hillary Clinton and will necessarily shade anything against Trump, whom I neither like nor promote nor endorse. However, an advisor to Clinton necessarily loses an element of credibility.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα
|