There's enough there for everybody
but Mike in intelligence, you must pick and choose whom you will believe and whom you won't.
I don't think it stinks, wrong maybe not by design.
My number one question is what would Bush gain by embroiling himself in a war that his father advised against?
Nobody comes up with an adequate answer.
Bush actually believed he did it for the right reason. I think he was wrong, but I don't fault him for the reasons are willing to believe he lied to wage war.
Every advocate shapes evidence to make his case; that's not dishonest. It's not a scholarly exercise.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα
|