View Single Post
Old 09-09-2008, 07:55 PM   #6
BYU71
Senior Member
 
BYU71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,084
BYU71 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cali Coug View Post
The government had to step in if they cared at all about market stability. Fannie and Freddie have issued over $5 TRILLION in agency paper. That is a HUGE amount of cash, and the government can't afford for Fannie and Freddie to look like they can't cover the paper. If they did, the dollar would be weakened tremendously, markets would seize up, money supply would tighten, etc. It would have been a disaster. I also think the government structured the "takeover" very well. The deal created a new class of preferred stock that will be issued to the government. In effect, by becoming a preferred stockholder, the government told the markets that the paper will be covered no matter what. In a liquidation, creditors are paid off first, followed by preferred stockholders, followed by common stockholders. By becoming a preferred stockholder, the government preserved the interests of the debtholders first, and we know the government isn't going to allow a default for the debtholders when it means the preferred stockholders (i.e., the government) would get nothing back.

The markets love the move so far. They have to. There was too much at risk if Fannie and Freddie went under.

Market fall out of love fast. Have you seen today. How about Lehman down to about $7. The greedy SOB's on wall st have totally messed up the financial structure. Before you blame Bush, why don't you check out the party ID's of some of the biggest Wall St. players.

Especially the ones that come up with these f'ed up schemes every so often.
BYU71 is offline   Reply With Quote