Originally Posted by creekster
Let's go over this again, limiting it to the simplest aspects of your comments without assuming any of the facts that are implicit in your comments but which you choose to disreagrd. The plane "should have been detected" means that it should have been on radar, correct? Ok. And then you said you would expect "them", which menas NORAD according to your other comments (but I am sure you'll tell me if I am wrong) to respond "immediately." And by respond I assumed youmeant somethign other than sit up in their chairs and dictate a memo. I assumed you meant that "they" should do something meaningful that might prevent the plane from colliding with a building. so then we ask, can this be achieved? No. It can't. LEt's say you are at 1,500 feet on a course parallel with the upper east side going at about 100 mph and you decide to ram a 500 foot tall aprtment building. How long will it take you to dive into the building? How far away would "they" have to keep planes from buildings n order to allow enough time for detection, information processing and a meaningful intervention? Even if a flight plan was filed, how would NORAD even know that it had not been followed? a central database is one possibility, but of course that was just silly me folloiwing my school of thought and putting words in your mouth. So how esle would NORAD find out? and if it is n't some sort of central database, tell me how long it would take for this information to move to NORAD from some other unidentified 'agency' that you referred to. Will this be longer than it takes to dive from altitufde into a building? Only if you keep all planes somewhere around Phildeplhia when they want to fly by Manhattan. WHat am I misrepresetning here? ANd, really, who is more in lawyer mode? (whatever that means)
I will first admit that I orignially presumed that you thought most of our urban areas were as important to protect as NYC. This, I will admit, springs from my personal bias as I live and work in neither NYC or DC, nor have I visited either city countless times. So I agree that given your clarification, and putting aside whether it is a reasonable position, I iwll limit the discussion to NYC and DC. I am sure that taking out LA's tallest building, or the Golden Gate Bridge, or one of CHicago's tallest buildings is of little consequence as long as we can hang on to NYC and DC. (This reminds me of those novelty maps that show the subject city in great detail and everything else as being little and uninteresting, but I digress.)
You are the one that pointed out that the Lidle plane issued a distress signal. You tell me what import that has. I simply point out that if anythign it makes it even less likely that the flight would be a terrorist flight and so, if one is in the chain of command deciding whether to risk shooting the plane down (along with the attendnat colateral damage) how would this information that you presented help?
The real point is that ANY plane flying with in many miles of manhattan constitutes a threat. So what? What is NORAD or anyone else supposed to DO about it?
You do like the last word, so go ahead and take it. I am sure no one else is eve reading at this point.
BTW, I think Rocky meant that he thought you had an unduly inflated or exaggerated sense of the relative worth of your opinions. Somehow I suspect you knew that.
|