|
05-01-2008, 03:19 AM | #1 |
Assistant to the Regional Manager
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
|
Ten Greatest Women in History
Relatives may not be included.
My ten, okay, I may have included eleven. Joan of Arc Marie Curie Florence Nightingale Hatshepsut, female pharaoh after the Hyksos period Rosa Parks Mother Theresa Catherine of Siena Susan B. Anthony Helen Keller Sacagawea Margaret Thatcher
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα |
05-01-2008, 03:21 AM | #2 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Bluth Home
Posts: 3,877
|
Quote:
__________________
The Bible tells us how to go to heaven, not how the heavens go. -Galileo |
|
05-01-2008, 03:22 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Between Iraq and a hard place
Posts: 7,569
|
Mary, mother of Jesus?
Curious omission. |
05-01-2008, 03:24 AM | #4 |
Assistant to the Regional Manager
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
|
Catholic sainting veneration drives me nuts. I know it's weird liking Joan of Arc but not the Virgin Mary, but then again, Joan is just a Saint, and the VM appears more than that. That's probably why I don't view her in the same realm.
And it's probably at the root of my problem with Emma, the obsequious veneration of her by others.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα |
05-01-2008, 03:26 AM | #5 |
Demiurge
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,365
|
It's a decent start to rehabilitating your image.
|
05-01-2008, 03:26 AM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Between Iraq and a hard place
Posts: 7,569
|
Quote:
|
|
05-01-2008, 03:30 AM | #7 |
Assistant to the Regional Manager
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
|
We know too little about her for me to include her in the list. If she makes your list, then so be it. I have nothing bad to say about her, in fact nothing at all, as what little is known by the Greek NT and a little in the BoM. It's next to nothing, so insufficient data from which to judge. Plus the Catholic veneration just drives me nuts.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα |
05-01-2008, 03:36 AM | #8 |
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
|
You missed my possibly no. 1. Because of Catherine the Great Russia is kind of a step child of Western Civilization, and one freakishly brilliant ableit deeply disturbed. Catherine singlehandedly imported the Enlighenment to Russia. Because of Catherine, Russia gave us Tolstoy and Dostoevski and Chekhov and Rimsey Korsakov and Tschaikovsky and Balenchine and so much more to uplift us spiritually, and during the cold war we knew in our heart of hearts that MAD would surely prevent a nuclear war (something we could never be sure about Iran or Al Qaeda). This contradiction drove Tolstoy and Dostoevsky crazy, that though they loved to bag on the Europeans they knew they were more European than Europeans. The Russians took the most beautiful elements of European culture and elevated them to a new level, and Catherine was the but for cause of it. I shudder to think of a world absent Catherine the Great. (I admit Catherine was a slut but I'm endeared by that too.)
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be. —Paul Auster |
05-01-2008, 03:38 AM | #9 |
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
|
Any objective person has to dismiss Mary from such a list as a mythical figure. She is in no way a historical figure. No way. Josephus doesn't even mention her.
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be. —Paul Auster |
05-01-2008, 03:39 AM | #10 | |
Assistant to the Regional Manager
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
|
Quote:
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|