cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board  

Go Back   cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board > non-Sports > Religion
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-06-2008, 06:01 PM   #1
SoCalCoug
Senior Member
 
SoCalCoug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 3,059
SoCalCoug is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

This is why we have judges in the court system. You can't force people to be reasonable or to changed their own paradigms. Sometimes you just need a judge to tell one side they're right and the other they're wrong (or something in between).

I had a recent situation with another attorney who was flat-out wrong in his interpretation of the law. He could not be convinced otherwise. Even after the judge (correctly)hammered him, he was still not convinced he was wrong, but at least he couldnt' continue with his stupid arguments.

In other words, I don't think SIEQ or TooBlue are going to change each other's opinions, no matter how much they try.
__________________
Get your stinking paws off me, you damned, dirty Yewt!

"Now perhaps as I spanked myself screaming out "Kozlowski, say it like you mean it bitch!" might have been out of line, but such was the mood." - Goatnapper

"If you want to fatten a pig up to make the pig MORE delicious, you can feed it almost anything. Seriously. The pig is like the car on Back to the Future. You put in garbage, and out comes something magical!" - Cali Coug
SoCalCoug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2008, 06:10 PM   #2
Indy Coug
Senior Member
 
Indy Coug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Between Iraq and a hard place
Posts: 7,569
Indy Coug is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SoCalCoug View Post
This is why we have judges in the court system. You can't force people to be reasonable or to changed their own paradigms. Sometimes you just need a judge to tell one side they're right and the other they're wrong (or something in between).

I had a recent situation with another attorney who was flat-out wrong in his interpretation of the law. He could not be convinced otherwise. Even after the judge (correctly)hammered him, he was still not convinced he was wrong, but at least he couldnt' continue with his stupid arguments.

In other words, I don't think SIEQ or TooBlue are going to change each other's opinions, no matter how much they try.
That's why all arguments should involve nothing but mathematics.
Indy Coug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2008, 06:11 PM   #3
Tex
Senior Member
 
Tex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,596
Tex is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SoCalCoug View Post
This is why we have judges in the court system. You can't force people to be reasonable or to changed their own paradigms. Sometimes you just need a judge to tell one side they're right and the other they're wrong (or something in between).

I had a recent situation with another attorney who was flat-out wrong in his interpretation of the law. He could not be convinced otherwise. Even after the judge (correctly)hammered him, he was still not convinced he was wrong, but at least he couldnt' continue with his stupid arguments.

In other words, I don't think SIEQ or TooBlue are going to change each other's opinions, no matter how much they try.
This is the role I fill here, and I'm happy to do it.

You're welcome.
Tex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2008, 06:23 PM   #4
tooblue
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,016
tooblue is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SoCalCoug View Post
This is why we have judges in the court system. You can't force people to be reasonable or to changed their own paradigms. Sometimes you just need a judge to tell one side they're right and the other they're wrong (or something in between).

I had a recent situation with another attorney who was flat-out wrong in his interpretation of the law. He could not be convinced otherwise. Even after the judge (correctly)hammered him, he was still not convinced he was wrong, but at least he couldnt' continue with his stupid arguments.

In other words, I don't think SIEQ or TooBlue are going to change each other's opinions, no matter how much they try.
You want to know what the funny thing is ... I really wanted to prop up SIEQ's quote and post as relevant and a means by which we can arrive at a more peaceful environment here in this forum. He took it as an attack. Therefore I obviously failed.
tooblue is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.