|
View Poll Results: How young too young | |||
No younger than 60 | 0 | 0% | |
No younger than 50 | 0 | 0% | |
No younger than 40 | 4 | 44.44% | |
No younger than 30 | 3 | 33.33% | |
No younger than 20 | 1 | 11.11% | |
If legal and horny that's old enough | 1 | 11.11% | |
Voters: 9. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
11-21-2008, 08:32 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Rexburg, Idaho
Posts: 2,236
|
Cannot be younger then your oldest child is always a good guide line. This is assuming your oldest is over 18.
__________________
"I always rode to my limit. If I won by three minutes, that's because I couldn't make four." Eddy Merckx |
11-21-2008, 08:42 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: DC
Posts: 995
|
|
11-21-2008, 08:48 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Gotham City
Posts: 7,157
|
|
11-21-2008, 10:35 PM | #14 |
Assistant to the Regional Manager
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
|
To what purpose one might add.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα |
11-21-2008, 10:39 PM | #15 | |
Assistant to the Regional Manager
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
|
Quote:
It reminds of the estate planning case of a Johnson and Johnson her who wished to avoid the GST, but his lawyers couldn't find a way of avoiding it. For those who are unaware, the GST imposes another estate tax upon persons who are 39 and 1/2 years younger than the donor. Apparently the J&J donor was in his eighties, and his girlfriend was a bit younger than that. He wanted to gift to her a multi-millionaire dollar house but by the gift inclusional aspect of the Estate and Gift Tax plus the GST came home, it would have cost his estate the same value as the house. So he married her. Problem solved. (I don't remember the case citation and may have garbled the facts a bit). The tax code seems to suggest that friendships more than 39 and one half years is too much. Go figure, they're such a bunch of fuddy duddies at the IRS.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα |
|
11-23-2008, 07:13 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: South Jordan, UT
Posts: 1,799
|
Doesn't anyone here know the formula?
(Age/2)+7 So for a sixty year old man, 37 would be the minimum age. And good for the 60 y.o. man in that situation, but that's still a little creepy IMO. Still plenty of hot women in their 40's.
__________________
WWPD? Last edited by Venkman; 11-23-2008 at 08:20 PM. |
11-23-2008, 09:31 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Gotham City
Posts: 7,157
|
I've always liked that formula. Using the same formula, the guy would also be a potential date for a 106-year-old.
|
11-23-2008, 11:08 PM | #18 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: South Jordan, UT
Posts: 1,799
|
Quote:
Talk about a Cougar. Rowwwrrr!
__________________
WWPD? |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|