10-23-2005, 10:17 PM | #1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: SLC
Posts: 25
|
Noah's flood
Yes this is the topic that banned me from CB many moons ago. How do you interpret Noah's flood? For me that was the toughest thing to swallow in the scriptures. A pair of every animal in the world? Not sure that is possible.
I submit that the flood was a local event in the 'fertile crescent' in the middle east.
__________________
"If you had a friend who was a tightrope walker, and you were walking down a sidewalk, and he fell, that would be completely unacceptable." |
10-23-2005, 10:45 PM | #2 |
Demiurge
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,365
|
Was it DirtyHippieUte who suggested that the arc was actually a DNA repository of life on the earth used to reseed the earth after massive destruction?
If you get tied down into literal interpretations of the Bible, you are doomed to mental gymnastics. |
10-24-2005, 01:26 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 3,059
|
What is interesting to me is the detail in the size and construction of the ark, contrasted to the seeming impossibility of putting two of every type of animal on it.
I guess the DNA repository thing could have been done, if it was by the aliens who built the pyramids.
__________________
Get your stinking paws off me, you damned, dirty Yewt! "Now perhaps as I spanked myself screaming out "Kozlowski, say it like you mean it bitch!" might have been out of line, but such was the mood." - Goatnapper "If you want to fatten a pig up to make the pig MORE delicious, you can feed it almost anything. Seriously. The pig is like the car on Back to the Future. You put in garbage, and out comes something magical!" - Cali Coug |
10-24-2005, 01:35 AM | #4 |
Assistant to the Regional Manager
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
|
There seems to be a general consensus that it was a
Fertile Crescent Flood.
The DNA repository is a fascinating idea as well.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα |
10-24-2005, 02:48 AM | #5 | |
Demiurge
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,365
|
Quote:
Get your terms straight. |
|
10-24-2005, 03:25 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Oak Ridge, TN
Posts: 1,308
|
flood
local event perhaps.
but probably symbollic. i think most of early genesis is symbollic. the earth is way older than 6000 years and the account of the creation/fall is symbollic. eating fruit didn't create the human condition, it symbollizes how things got the way they are. no gymnastics and much, much more meaningful. Regards, Brian |
10-24-2005, 05:10 AM | #7 |
I must not tell lies
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,103
|
Supposing the flood was 5000-6000 years ago, is it possible there has been enough evolution and cross-species mating since then to fill the San Diego Zoo? Hey if I was a curelom and saw one of those lovely cumoms across the way, I might try batting for the other team.
|
10-24-2005, 11:18 AM | #8 |
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
|
State of evolution 5-6 thousand years ago
Five to six thousand years is a thin slice of time in the age of the earth and its species. Five to six thousand years ago there were a multitude of species, nearly resembling what we have today.
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be. —Paul Auster |
10-25-2005, 04:31 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,506
|
....
while these pagans here will have you believe it was a flood in a specific part of the world i think it very possible that it is a literal story.
few possibilities. a. more than one noah. b. if snow was covering the earth than the whole earth would be submerged without liquid water covering every inch of the earth. |
11-02-2005, 08:00 PM | #10 |
Demiurge
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,365
|
what the heck is catastrophic evolution?
|
Bookmarks |
|
|