10-03-2006, 04:52 PM | #31 | |
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
|
Quote:
I wouldn't use Utefans as a model. That place is like feeding time at the zoo.
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be. —Paul Auster Last edited by SeattleUte; 10-03-2006 at 04:54 PM. |
|
10-03-2006, 10:26 PM | #32 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 56
|
It is based on Utefans model
Quote:
|
|
10-03-2006, 11:01 PM | #33 | |
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
|
Quote:
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be. —Paul Auster Last edited by SeattleUte; 10-03-2006 at 11:08 PM. |
|
10-03-2006, 11:48 PM | #34 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: the far corner of my mind
Posts: 8,711
|
It seems to be an answer to a question no one asked and something that no one likes.
__________________
Sorry for th e tpyos. |
10-04-2006, 12:03 AM | #35 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 56
|
|
10-04-2006, 12:18 AM | #36 | |
Assistant to the Regional Manager
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
|
Quote:
However, as outsider looking inside, it appears to be a better option to opt in, than to opt out.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα |
|
10-04-2006, 12:48 AM | #37 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: the far corner of my mind
Posts: 8,711
|
Quote:
It isn't that big of deal as a concept. IF you are too lazy to figure out who you don't like, then go ahead and let the code do it for you. The only probelm is that many people, such as newly joining board members, may never become aware of the spectrum of opinions or personalities out there unless they act to opt out, as opposed to being required to opt it. Does this serve them? How can they know without seeing what they are missing? I agree it is your board, and you can do what you want. the strange thing, from my point of view, is that this will eventully serve to isolate people from others without them ever being aware of it. Sort of creating a board where many people are little 'Trumans' living in a copasetic world not of their choice or understanding. I realize this is a bit dramatic and overstated, but it makes the point that the presumption, as in our society at large (inclduing the gospel) is access with a choice to opt out (especially appropriate where, as here, there are so many other means of protecting members from inappropriate material). I have mine set to zero. can you tell what percentage of people who have changed their setting have changed it to zero?
__________________
Sorry for th e tpyos. |
|
10-04-2006, 02:28 PM | #38 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,177
|
The question is how can we further manipulate the board to take out dissenting voices so that all who reads the board will come away with an image of BYU and LDS church that we think is proper. It's our job to protect the image of the church and we know what's best for it.
|
Bookmarks |
|
|