cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board  

Go Back   cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board > non-Sports > Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-15-2008, 09:48 PM   #11
MikeWaters
Demiurge
 
MikeWaters's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,365
MikeWaters is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Homo Erectus View Post
Thanks MW. I certainly agree with the points made, but my feeling is that the irrelevance of the voters in the 30-odd states with primaries after Super Tuesday is a bigger issue than "building momentum" or logistical issues.
Not irrelevant this year esp.

Also you forget, you can still vote for the other nominees and thereby effect things at the convention. If Ron Paul gets 40% of the delegates, you are going to see a very different convention and a different platform than if he gets 2% of the delegates.
MikeWaters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2008, 10:04 PM   #12
NorCal Cat
Senior Member
 
NorCal Cat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Where do you think?
Posts: 1,201
NorCal Cat
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Homo Erectus View Post
Anyone know why the primaries are spread out the way they are? Why should states like New Hampshire and Iowa and Michigan have so much say in which candidates are chosen by their parties as our presidential candidates? If a guy like Fred Thompson or Joe Biden had significant support in the West, but lost big in the early primaries, he'd be toast, and feel heat to throw in the towel and endorse one of the front-runners. Why don't we have all the primaries on the same day? It'd be nice to know my vote had some ramifications as to who the presidential candidates end up being. Any thoughts on this?
I don't know, but it is pretty lame. They should rotate the order.
NorCal Cat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2008, 10:05 PM   #13
Cali Coug
Senior Member
 
Cali Coug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,996
Cali Coug has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeWaters View Post
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_...ential_primary

So there is no rationale. No reason for anything about the current system. It is merely tradition. Ok. Thanks for the insight.
We are talking about the rationale for holding primaries in certain states on certain dates. And yes, the reason is simply tradition. Why do you think New Hampshire is always going to be the first primary? Why is Iowa the first caucus? Why can't Michigan move its primary up ahead of Super Tuesday? Why did both parties penalize Michigan and Florida for moving up? Answer: tradition.

You are just trying to be confrontational, and I don't know why. If you had a point, it could be worth it. As it is, you are just back to trolling on your own board.
Cali Coug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2008, 10:06 PM   #14
Cali Coug
Senior Member
 
Cali Coug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,996
Cali Coug has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeWaters View Post
there ought to be a lottery, where different states are moved up to the front every cycle.

but as you know, when there are entrenched interests and powers, things don't change. Look at the BCS and the bowls.

This process is not about getting the best president. It's making sure that the right palms are greased.
Entrenched interests and powers, things that don't change. Sounds like... tradition.

Guess why there isn't a lottery: tradition.
Cali Coug is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.