10-27-2008, 12:46 AM | #11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,964
|
Quote:
__________________
...You've been under attack for days, there's a soldier down, he's wounded, gangrene's setting in, 'Who's used all the penicillin?' 'Oh, Mark Paxson sir, he's got knob rot off of some tart.'" - Gareth Keenan |
|
10-27-2008, 12:47 AM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Gotham City
Posts: 7,157
|
He's arguing that the difference is in how the two manifest themselves outwardly. If one truly believes, one acts upon that belief; if one only hopes, one is content to live disregarding whatever actions are implicitly required by the stated beliefs.
|
10-27-2008, 02:33 AM | #13 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,016
|
Quote:
The conventional notions of knowledge are: 1. acquaintance with facts, truths, or principles, as from study or investigation; general erudition: knowledge of many things .... http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/knowledge The only person doing the mangling is you. How can you 'know' I don't know when you ARE NOT aquainted with the facts, truths or principles etc. I am? It is a matter of perception ... the perception you lack! |
|
10-27-2008, 02:55 AM | #14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Gotham City
Posts: 7,157
|
Quote:
|
|
10-27-2008, 02:55 AM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,589
|
If we go with what Joseph Smith defined as a perfect testimony of God, i.e. there have only been a few who are capable of denying the Holy Ghost as only a few truly have a knowledge of it, then I'd say you're in pretty distinct company, tooblue.
I guess that assumes that you accept Joseph Smith as a prophet. You're right in that it's not essential to me to know if you know. I'm just observing what I see as conflicting ideas (so many members claiming to "know" while J.S. teaching that few people know). |
10-27-2008, 03:01 AM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,589
|
Sorry for the threadjack, BG. That's why I deleted my original post right after I posted it.
I do think the article is interesting in that it highlights the difference between how we act and how we claim to believe. I wouldn't say that necessarily denies our actual belief, or even tooblue's knowledge. It just speaks to our weakness as individuals more than anything else. If we all acted according to what we know, we would have no smokers, no fat people, no high school dropouts, etc. We're often just weak in the moment, particularly when dealing with long-term consequences (and is there anything more long-term than heaven?). It is inspiring, however, to reevaluate our daily actions to see if they're in accord with what we claim to believe. |
10-27-2008, 03:15 AM | #17 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Gotham City
Posts: 7,157
|
Quote:
If you think about the few people in the testaments who actually came face to face with the glory of the Almighty, first they were scared out of their minds, then they were energized to foresake everything for the sake of the call. Sure there are a few people who have been able to duplicate that kind of belief and commitment without (so far as we know) having "seen," but there is maybe one of those individuals every one or two generations. I think the author is correct that the truest belief -- ideal belief -- necessitates action. But that level of belief is a gift that's exceedingly rare. |
|
10-27-2008, 03:25 AM | #18 | |
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
|
Quote:
Second, the example he uses--that if Christians really believed millions of babies were being exterminated they would lay down their lives if necessary to try to stop it--is contrary to what history has shown about human nature. Just today I read the following from an essay by Ian Kershaw, Hitler's foremost biographer: "The road to Auschwitz was built by hate, but paved with indifference.... The general passivity which marked the most pervasive reaction—or perhaps one should say non-reaction—to the persecution and extermination of the Jews reflected above all the low level in the ranking of priorities which the fate of the Jews occupied in German consciousness. "So far in history no other advanced society has experienced a collapse of collective moral consciousness and individual civil morality approximating to the steepness of the decline in Germany after 1933. It was above all the absence of a choice against evil." The indifferent masses of German people weren't evil. They were just too worried about getting enough to eat, about their children's futures in war torn Germany, about loved ones on the front, about heating their homes, to give much thought or sacrifice to save the millions they knew were being exterminated, including children. My sense is the same thing is true about Christians who truly believe abortion is murder. They aren't going to revolt against government to stop it because they're distracted by their own immediate problems. They're indiffernt, but not because they don't believe it's murder. That being said, I think non-sequitor got it right in responding to tooblue's gibberish. Outside of Mormonism's "I know. . ." culture, belief and faith are considered the realistic end of a commitment to spirituality; purporting to "know" a supernatural element is considered a self-deluded immaturity, or, as Barabara says, an ironic expression of insecure faith. I don't think this atheist makes any more convincing argument against the legitimacy of belief or faith than tooblue makes one for "KNOWING" God lives.
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be. —Paul Auster Last edited by SeattleUte; 10-27-2008 at 03:29 AM. |
|
10-27-2008, 04:21 AM | #19 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Bluth Home
Posts: 3,877
|
Quote:
This is at least as true for those who "merely hope" and my experience teaches me that hope is actually a more powerful motivator that knowledge since we all hear what we want to hear and act in conformance with our desires. Of course many are more cynical and won't act on their hopes, but again the full range is possible. The premise argued is one that I think would be easy to arrive at if you had never experienced the realities and paradoxes of a life of faith on some level. This is what he imagines belief, as opposed to hope, would cause everyone to do but, as I say, I just think the premise is flatly wrong.
__________________
The Bible tells us how to go to heaven, not how the heavens go. -Galileo |
|
10-27-2008, 04:25 AM | #20 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Bluth Home
Posts: 3,877
|
Quote:
__________________
The Bible tells us how to go to heaven, not how the heavens go. -Galileo |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|