10-19-2007, 04:18 PM | #21 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 9,483
|
Quote:
My children are not even three and they already like the Beatles. And I bet money that their children in 20+ years will also like the Beatles. It is timeless music. Not sure about the Stones. Check that...I am sure about the Stones.
__________________
Fitter. Happier. More Productive. "Everyone is against me. Everyone is fawning for 3D's attention and defending him." -- SeattleUte |
|
10-19-2007, 04:20 PM | #22 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: the far corner of my mind
Posts: 8,711
|
Quote:
__________________
Sorry for th e tpyos. |
|
10-19-2007, 04:21 PM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 9,483
|
This is why The Stones will never touch the Beatles. The Stones' catalog has tiers. Some of it is good, some of it is average, MOST of it is forgettable since they keep putting out crap and touring...conversely, there is no "classic" beatles era. The Beatles continued to evolve and redefine themselves and music. As a matter of fact, as they aged, their later albums blow away their earlier ones (would you rather listen to White, Revolver, Rubber Soul....or With the Beatles...or Meet the Beatles?).
Come to think of it, I don't even really enjoy the Stones that much. I think I like maybe 10-15 of their songs over the years.
__________________
Fitter. Happier. More Productive. "Everyone is against me. Everyone is fawning for 3D's attention and defending him." -- SeattleUte |
10-19-2007, 04:21 PM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: the far corner of my mind
Posts: 8,711
|
But how are we to choose the greatesdt band? One consensus that seems to be emrging among us still particiapting in this thread is that VanHalen is NOT the greatest band under any criteria. True?
__________________
Sorry for th e tpyos. |
10-19-2007, 04:25 PM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Rexburg, Idaho
Posts: 2,236
|
After the Beetles I'm gonna throw U2 out there. Still making music after twenty five years that people buy. For the Stones if you buy "Hot Rocks" you've got most of the good stuff and that's only a period of eight years. The Who had a good run of ten years. Led Zeppelin made a big splash but faded fast. I think G n R had a chance to be great but Rose is a dumbass.
|
10-19-2007, 04:26 PM | #26 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 9,483
|
Quote:
I was only about 8 then, but my explained to me that John was the singer who sang all the songs we listened to in the car and he had been shot. We would stay in NYC in the summers with our cousins and that following summer we went to the Dakota. Whenever I am in NYC, I usually wind up trying to swing by their, or now Strawberry Fields in Central Park. It is fun to read the tributes people leave to John and the Beatles from all over the world and to see the continued impact their music has on peoples' lives. Truly, it could be argued that Imagine is the greatest song ever written. When I went into Junior high, my mom let me read Catcher in the Rye. It has remained my favorite book of all time ever since then (sort of a sentimental favorite).
__________________
Fitter. Happier. More Productive. "Everyone is against me. Everyone is fawning for 3D's attention and defending him." -- SeattleUte |
|
10-19-2007, 04:27 PM | #27 | |
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
|
Quote:
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be. —Paul Auster |
|
10-19-2007, 04:27 PM | #28 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern California
Posts: 2,919
|
|
10-19-2007, 04:29 PM | #29 | |
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
|
Quote:
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be. —Paul Auster |
|
10-19-2007, 04:34 PM | #30 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 9,483
|
Quote:
OK, I will throw out some ideas in NO order and see what the group thinks: 1. Reasonable stability within the band...meaning if you change band members every few years and wind up with a load of people who can say they were in your band, then you do not qualify. 2. Commercial success...while this should NEVER be the measure of greatness, it is usually a measure of mass and broad appeal. Kind of hard to argue for membership in the pantheon if you did not sell a lot of records 3. Touring...I dont think this should be a major criteria because it would be unfair to earlier acts (Elvis, for example) when touring was not as important. While the Beatles were likely lousy live and opted to not tour after their Candlestick show, can anyone name an iconic Stones show? The Beatles appearance on Ed Sullivan and on the rooftops on Saville Row are some of the most iconic performances in rock history. 4. Innovation....did you take music in a new direction? What did you do that was innovative? 5. Longevity.....are people still listening to your music and talking about your for good? Or are they talking about you because you stuck around for so long? 6. Influence....who have you influenced? do artists reference you as an influence? 7. Impact......did you do something to impact, for good or bad, the political or social landscape of your time and beyond? Anyway, some thoughts.
__________________
Fitter. Happier. More Productive. "Everyone is against me. Everyone is fawning for 3D's attention and defending him." -- SeattleUte |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|