11-05-2008, 04:49 PM | #31 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Gotham City
Posts: 7,157
|
|
11-05-2008, 05:04 PM | #32 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 9,483
|
The nice thing about this being over is that people can go back to pretending to love homosexuals, just not homosexuality.
__________________
Fitter. Happier. More Productive. "Everyone is against me. Everyone is fawning for 3D's attention and defending him." -- SeattleUte |
11-05-2008, 05:16 PM | #33 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 102
|
Quote:
The gay lifestyle simply contradicts all that I have ever been taught with respect to proper relationships between men and women. Those teachings have not only come from the Church leaders, but were also principles taught to me by a mother that was raised catholic. My mother has a 3rd grade education, born in Mexico, barely speaks any english, but, on her own raised 5 kids that all went on to college, got their degrees, and are now good citizens where they live. She taught us that education was our ticket out of poverty and made sure we went to school to learn. Despite her limited education, she is probably one of the smartest people I know. My mother taught us to recognize proper moral behaviors, as defined by our belief in a Supreme Creator. And, living a gay lifestyle, violated that Supreme Creator's teachings. We were never taught that if we lived gay lifestyles we were going to hell or going to die of aids, we were taught to respect others' rights, but, we were taught to stand up to that which we believe to be immoral and did not promote decency and morality. Now, one can argue for or against the merits of prop 8 and its implications on society, but, I believe voting for prop 8 simply came down to how uncomfortable people become when they think about two men having sex. Some of you may get turned on just thinking about it, but I don't, it disgusts me and don't want anything to with it. And I certainly don't want to legitimize what I consider to be improper moral behavior by diluting the significance of how a man and woman express their commitment to one another by getting married. I am not a practitioner of medicine and have no "book learning" with respect to whether one is born gay or makes a choice to become gay. I believe in God and believe it was never his intent that a man lay with another man. He created Adam and Eve and there are no ifs, ands, or buts about it. If I don't stand up to those whose sole purpose is to legitimize the "gay agenda" or for that matter, to stand up against other issues that I believe to be immoral, then I am not excercising my rights as an American citizen. But it does not make me a bigot, undeducated or sheep. Those supporting prop 8 spoke, those against prop 8 spoke, the people voted, game over, at least for now. To be honest, it was not only SU's post that got me all fired up, that LDS missionary add yesterday had somenthing to do with it as well. I was not offended by the add as it was comical, it just irked me that the Church was singled out when other denominations also supported the prop and the majority of the voters belong to the other denominations. |
|
11-05-2008, 05:24 PM | #34 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,589
|
A straw man that you're somehow defending. Do I need to spell this out? After all, any dissent on a supreme court decision would be made by a qualified SC justice who understands the constitution, right? And the SC has no right to trump the people's will, right?
|
11-05-2008, 05:24 PM | #35 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Valencia CA
Posts: 1,384
|
Exactly. In addition, a whole new generation of young Mormons will find is easy to pretend with their parents now. Mormon children everywhere have seen the hand of god strike down gay love in CA. Isn't it neat?!
|
11-05-2008, 05:25 PM | #36 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,589
|
Quote:
|
|
11-05-2008, 05:28 PM | #37 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Where do you think?
Posts: 1,201
|
|
11-05-2008, 05:30 PM | #38 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Where do you think?
Posts: 1,201
|
|
11-05-2008, 05:31 PM | #39 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,589
|
|
11-05-2008, 05:31 PM | #40 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,596
|
Quote:
My point to SoCal is that even the most highly educated and legally bright among us are quite divided over whether or not the CA Supreme Court could legally step in. Four judges argued they could (and did); three argued they couldn't. I happen to agree with the three. He agrees with the four. That doesn't make either of us by definition "ignorant." Your little straw man is entirely ancillary to the discussion.
__________________
"Have we been commanded not to call a prophet an insular racist? Link?" "And yes, [2010] is a very good year to be a Democrat. Perhaps the best year in decades ..." - Cali Coug "Oh dear, granny, what a long tail our puss has got." - Brigham Young |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|