![]() |
![]() |
#61 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,502
![]() |
![]()
A degree in biological anthropology from ASU is at least as good as one from Harvard. In cultural anthropology, AZ is top 5ish. I don't know as much about the other schools. I will agree that they aren't the all-around awesome schools like Harvard, Stanford, Duke, Michigan, Berkeley, etc., but not all schools can really do that, so they focus on certain areas. They at least try. I do concede that research isn't the whole thing, and that the greater academic environment is the bigger issue. Not only does BYU generally not care about research, but they're also not big on academic freedom and whatnot. Call it discrimination if you want, because it probably is, but academics don't think too highly of limited inquiry due to religious roadblocks.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#62 |
AKA SeattleNewt
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 7,055
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#63 |
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
![]() |
![]()
I think if they want to go to 12 they will take Utah unless they can get something more attractive. They will try to get Colorado and Texas but probably fail at least with Texas. I think they would take New Mexico, Air Force, or Hawaii before they took BYU. I don't think they'd take BYU under any circumstances for the reasons I've stated. I was curious about Hawaii and did a little research in Wikipedia. I was surprised to see "the University of Hawaii system" has 50,000 students and a $3 billion endowment.
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be. —Paul Auster |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#64 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 9,483
![]() |
![]() Quote:
Let's apply SU's argument here. Of the schools you mentioned, which are the grand dame research institutions that the Pac chancellors so keenly crave? Also, which 2 entrants provide the natural geographic rivalry that exists amongst the other 10 members? Remember, they HAVE to expand to 12 teams or else no BCS.
__________________
Fitter. Happier. More Productive. "Everyone is against me. Everyone is fawning for 3D's attention and defending him." -- SeattleUte |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#65 |
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
![]() |
![]()
No way to all of these except maybe Utah and maybe mabye Hawaii or Nevada. SDSU are you kidding? The Cal schools turn up their noses at the "State" schools. Again, they are hyper elitist.
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be. —Paul Auster |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#66 |
AKA SeattleNewt
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 7,055
![]() |
![]()
I understand what you're saying, but SDSU has to be in the conversation if we're discussing hypothetical PAC10 expansion. I think Boise State would get preference over Nevada. All biases aside, BYU and Utah bring the most to the table. By far.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#67 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 9,483
![]() |
![]() Quote:
As for prestige, keep in mind that amongst the BCS conferences, it is the Pac that is always crying about no respect (I would put the Big Least as the least respected, however). If not for SC's dominance, the Pac would have little to hang its hat on compared to its BCS brethren. You are suggesting that if the Pac is forced to expand, it is somehow going to steal away 2 Big 12 schools? So your answer is that if the Pac is forced to expand, it will add the awesome pairing of Utah and New Mexico. Or Utah and Hawaii. All because "BYU is weird." Not smarter. Less dumb.
__________________
Fitter. Happier. More Productive. "Everyone is against me. Everyone is fawning for 3D's attention and defending him." -- SeattleUte |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#68 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 9,483
![]() |
![]() Quote:
I disagree that it really will have much to do with who plays football in their conference. Like I pointed out, several schools already play in the Pac 10 for certain sports, and they have no academic pedigree whatsover. Cal State Bakersfield! SDSU!
__________________
Fitter. Happier. More Productive. "Everyone is against me. Everyone is fawning for 3D's attention and defending him." -- SeattleUte |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#69 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 9,483
![]() |
![]() Quote:
And it is for this reason that I believe that the Pac fights expansion. I don't argue that they don't want us. I agree with SU on that one. But if it came to expansion, they have NO choice but to take us. And the Utes.
__________________
Fitter. Happier. More Productive. "Everyone is against me. Everyone is fawning for 3D's attention and defending him." -- SeattleUte |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#70 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 9,483
![]() |
![]()
CS Bakersfield already plays as a Pac 10 team in certain sports. As does CS Fullerton.
__________________
Fitter. Happier. More Productive. "Everyone is against me. Everyone is fawning for 3D's attention and defending him." -- SeattleUte |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|