cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board  

Go Back   cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board > SPORTS! > Cycling
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-06-2005, 10:53 PM   #1
SteelBlue
Senior Member
 
SteelBlue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Norcal
Posts: 5,821
SteelBlue is an unknown quantity at this point
Default I'd love to see this!

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/200....ap/index.html

Looks like the French may have pissed Lance off enough for him to win one more.
SteelBlue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2005, 12:01 AM   #2
Archaea
Assistant to the Regional Manager
 
Archaea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
Archaea is an unknown quantity at this point
Default It would serve them right, the French I mean

to have a clean Armstrong clobber them.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα
Archaea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2005, 12:37 AM   #3
creekster
Senior Member
 
creekster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: the far corner of my mind
Posts: 8,711
creekster is an unknown quantity at this point
Default This is the precise flaw with L'equipe's intended inference

Let's just say that LA's samples from 99 tested positive for EPO. By '01 there was an EPO testing protocol in place and being used. He has been tested for EPO both in and out of competition ever since. He has never failed any of those tests. So even if he was positive in '99, he still kicked their butts for 5 years while testing negative undser the sanme test they are now applying retroactively. This certainly doens't make drug use in '99 acceptable, but it certainly doens't seem to taint the validity of his victory, either.
creekster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2005, 12:57 AM   #4
ute4ever
I must not tell lies
 
ute4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,103
ute4ever is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

I don't see what this will prove. They claim his '99 win was tainted, but apparently not '00 - '05. So what if he makes another clean win in '06? They'll still criticize '99.

Aren't the French the people who believe the US staged 9/11/01?
ute4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2005, 01:05 AM   #5
Parrot Head
Senior Member
 
Parrot Head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 763
Parrot Head is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Did anyone see that WADA Chair Dick Pound said it is “highly probable” that Lance Armstrong tested positive for the banned blood booster EPO in ’99. Pound: “After studying all the evidence from this affair I’m of the opinion that there is evidence of doping.”

Of course, this was also quoted in the French AFP.

Isn't Richard American?

WADA=World Anti-Doping Assn
Parrot Head is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2005, 02:02 AM   #6
creekster
Senior Member
 
creekster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: the far corner of my mind
Posts: 8,711
creekster is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Actually,

Richard Pound is Canadian, but his middle name might be head.

Pound's WADA VP, a Finn, has criticized Pound's conclusions calling them premature and (paraphrased) reckless, btw.
creekster is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.