More gibberish

[Archaea]

http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.c...5-CD5BAE70B323

The premise here is that Romney has not grown as a man and that he is not confident.

Yet, the author writes:

There is also a difference in the fundamental character of the two. Though I have never met Romney, I’ve worked with politicians going on 40 years now, and he seems like a man who is very unsure of himself.
But Reagan, whom I worked for and with, appeared to me — and millions of others – like a sunny man who was very sure of himself. So confident was he and other successful aspirants, they spent their time talking about and to the voters and not about themselves.

So he knew Reagan but he has never met Romney. He pretends to know the psyche of a man he's never met. Gotcha.