Hillary to Bibi: What part of "no settlements" do you not understand?

[MikeWaters]

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, rebuffing Israel on an important issue, said Wednesday that the Obama administration wants a complete halt in the growth of Jewish settlements on Palestinian territory, with no exceptions.

President Obama "wants to see a stop to settlements -- not some settlements, not outposts, not natural-growth exceptions," Clinton said.

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationwo...,4082953.story

I'm glad someone has a pair.

[Tex]

It's telling that the Obama administration's harshest rebuffs are reserved not for Iran or North Korea, but for Israel.

It's too bad Yassir isn't still around for Obama to give a big bear hug to.

[MikeWaters]

Please. Obama took it up the backside from Bibi.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/28/op...ohen.html?_r=1

The president ceded to Israeli pressure for a timetable on any Iran talks, saying a “reassessment” should be possible by year’s end (Israel had pressed for an October deadline). Obama talked of the possibility of “much stronger international sanctions” against Iran, undermining his groundbreaking earlier overture that included a core truth: “This process will not be advanced by threats.”

Obama also allowed Netanyahu to compliment him for “leaving all options on the table” — the standard formula for a possible U.S. military strike against Iran — when he said nothing of the sort. The president did, however, use that tired phrase in a Newsweek interview this month — another mistake given the unthinkable consequences of a third U.S. war front in the Muslim world.

In return, what did Obama get? Not even acknowledgment from Netanyahu that Palestinian statehood, rather than some form of eternal limbo, is the notional goal of negotiations.

Score one for Netanyahu, who, in the words of one former American official who knows him well, “is the kind of guy who negotiates the time he will go to the bathroom.”