06-06-2007, 10:01 PM | #1 |
Assistant to the Regional Manager
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
|
Reading about the development of sexual attitudes in America
is a fascinating discussion.
One or two salient points. Perhaps it is obvious to others, but to me it was not. First, until recently, our culture did not think in terms of "sexuality" as a separate concept. People did not think of themselves in terms of hetero and homo, but only that it was something you did, not a character trait. Second, the reforming movement for marriage here and in England was a power play, the ministers wanted additional authority. And the puritans wanted it for marriage as opposed to how may settlers used it for a committed relationship. Yet puritans were not victorian, they enjoyed and encouraged rich sexuality within marriage.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα |
06-06-2007, 10:28 PM | #2 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Gotham City
Posts: 7,157
|
Quote:
Do they suggest how or why this change came about? It's interesting, because if you define it as something one does rather than something one is, then it might be easier to define it as sin. |
|
06-06-2007, 10:37 PM | #3 | |
Assistant to the Regional Manager
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
|
Quote:
There wasn't a discussion of sexual preference. In fact, people until the latter half of the twentieth century didn't see it in those terms. I get the feeling that some people were more "bi", not exclusively "homo". Historically, bisexuality was a more common occurrence, and exclusively "homo" was rare. But I'm using improper terminology. The author is quite effective.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα |
|
06-07-2007, 02:27 AM | #4 | |
Resident Jackass
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Roswell, New Mexico
Posts: 1,846
|
Quote:
Last edited by Detroitdad; 06-07-2007 at 04:16 AM. |
|
06-07-2007, 03:10 AM | #5 |
Assistant to the Regional Manager
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Orgasmatron
Posts: 24,338
|
It's this book, "Sexual Revolution in Early America" by Richard Godbeer. It is written in decent prose with reasonable justifications and citations. Now I have checked the sources, but everything sounds plausible.
__________________
Ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα |
Bookmarks |
|
|