06-18-2008, 06:06 PM | #31 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,084
|
Wow, I really have never noticed that you are so sensitive. You might be the first person I have ever met that "really, really" does think their shit doesn't stink.
|
06-18-2008, 06:07 PM | #32 |
AKA SeattleNewt
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 7,055
|
|
06-18-2008, 06:08 PM | #33 |
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
|
YOhio, please find and post a FUNNY liberal take on conservatives so we can show our dislike of this clip is on the merits.
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be. —Paul Auster |
06-18-2008, 06:08 PM | #34 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The People's Republic of Monsanto
Posts: 3,085
|
Quote:
You don't think it's funny--I've got it. No harm, no foul. I couldn't care less. But you trying to make some kind of serious political something or other out of this is wild man. Talking about it as a POS ad. It's really out there. Admit it, you just got bent out of shape. I'm sorry, seriously.
__________________
"Do not despise the words of prophets, but test everything; hold fast to what is good; " 1 Thess. 5:21 (NRSV) We all trust our own unorthodoxies. Last edited by Sleeping in EQ; 06-18-2008 at 06:11 PM. |
|
06-18-2008, 06:09 PM | #35 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The People's Republic of Monsanto
Posts: 3,085
|
Quote:
On the liberal side, you need go no further than Colbert or the Daily Show. I'm not sure how many more times I'll have to type this, but "you don't think it is funny. I get it. No problem."
__________________
"Do not despise the words of prophets, but test everything; hold fast to what is good; " 1 Thess. 5:21 (NRSV) We all trust our own unorthodoxies. Last edited by Sleeping in EQ; 06-18-2008 at 06:13 PM. |
|
06-18-2008, 06:11 PM | #36 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,084
|
Quote:
What really has me pissed is the double standard from the media. The liberal media would be all over the right if they put out the same type of ad. |
|
06-18-2008, 06:12 PM | #37 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,084
|
|
06-18-2008, 06:12 PM | #38 |
AKA SeattleNewt
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 7,055
|
|
06-18-2008, 06:22 PM | #39 |
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,665
|
__________________
Interrupt all you like. We're involved in a complicated story here, and not everything is quite what it seems to be. —Paul Auster |
06-18-2008, 06:26 PM | #40 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The People's Republic of Monsanto
Posts: 3,085
|
Quote:
Yeah, some of them would. But then we essentially have a hybrid corporate-partisan press these days. The era of "journalistic objectivity" never really existed, but the journalism that sought multiple points of view and genuine balance that thrived after yellow journalism and lost much of it's habitat with the conversion to 24-hour commentary networks (they do very little news much of the time) and the New Media is an endangered species. There is a profitable audience that will watch a liberal commentator "analyze" a conservative ad. That's where we are at. You know this, but I'm sure it can be frustrating. There are very few media outlets I think are credible. In terms of broadcasting, NPR and C-Span are a cut above (I am actually one of the three people who watches C-Span, the program they have on Gordon Brown taking questions in the House of Commons on Sunday Nights at 9 Eastern is excellent). The WSJ is worth reading to get news with a conservative (but often reasonable) perspective. I've gone off-shore for much of my media. The BBC, the International Herald Tribune, CNN International (it's better than the domestic product), and Al-Jazeera English.
__________________
"Do not despise the words of prophets, but test everything; hold fast to what is good; " 1 Thess. 5:21 (NRSV) We all trust our own unorthodoxies. Last edited by Sleeping in EQ; 06-18-2008 at 06:29 PM. |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|