![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,177
![]() |
![]()
I run NBA productivity stats and compare with averages at each position. This is how guys are ranking comparing their NBA productivity per 40 minutes to a baseline average for their position.
Really good: Keena, Cummard, Ainge Kinda good: Balderson, Malaman, Burgess Kinda bad: Plaisted Really bad: Broadus, Vuk, Rose, Tavernari, Murdock |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,177
![]() |
![]()
P.S. I think a decent way to interpret this is that if everybody was average, we would have expected to win half the games we had played over the time period evaluated.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,431
![]() |
![]() Quote:
Last edited by pelagius; 12-07-2006 at 11:38 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,177
![]() |
![]()
Interestingly enough, a little better last year but not drastically.
End of last year, I would have put it like this. Really good: Balderson, Reichner, Young Kinda good: Cummard, Malaman Kinda bad: Plaisted, Broadus, Ainge, Rose, Dawes, Really bad: none Plaisted individually last year Good: #FT, Avg: Points, FG %, FT %, Rebounding, Assists, TO's Bad: Blocks, Steals This year Good: Off Rebounds, Avg: everything else Bad: Assists, Steals, Blocks |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|