cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board  

Go Back   cougarguard.com — unofficial BYU Cougars / LDS sports, football, basketball forum and message board > non-Sports > Finances
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-16-2007, 02:48 AM   #11
ChinoCoug
Senior Member
 
ChinoCoug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NOVA
Posts: 3,005
ChinoCoug is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jay santos View Post
Corporations can't dodge taxes, so I'm sure Gates through Microsoft pays more taxes than anyone.
Buffet already gave half his fortune to Gates Foundation, so Gates can't really win.
__________________
太初有道
ChinoCoug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2007, 01:48 PM   #12
BYU71
Senior Member
 
BYU71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,084
BYU71 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeWaters View Post
He has come forward and said that his receptionist pays about 33% of income as tax, and that he pays close to half that at 18%.

He has challenged the richest men in America, saying that if one can come forward and demonstrate that he pays a higher percentage than his receptionist, that he will donate $1 million to the charity of his/her choice.

So the media is contacting all those tycoons.

Not a single one has come forward, all have declined to comment. It's crickets, baby.

Warren Buffet doesn't think it's right that the richest Americans pay less tax, proportionally, than those that are not rich.

Yes, I know many of the poorest don't pay income taxes, after refund, but still I admire Buffet stirring things up.
I haven't read everything Buffet said, so I don't no if he stirred things up or you are. First off, what does the 33% tax represent.

If she had adjusted gross income and no deduction after that and was single and made $1,036,000 a year, she would be paying roughly 32.33%. If she is a receptionist and makes over $1,000,000 I don't feel too sorry for her. (this is based on the 2006 tax rate schedule I looked up). For a single taxpayer you don't even hit the highest marginal tax rate until $336,550 in income. That means you pay 35% on anything over that.

So I guess Buffet meant total taxes as a percent. Fed Income, State INcome, Property taxes, sales tax, gasoline tax, etc. Of course the rich pay a smaller percentage on all those taxes. When someone steps up and buys a gallon of gas do you think the gas tax should be a progressive tax too. Let's see, show me your income statement and we will let you know how much you have to pay in gas tax. Your sales tax on this banana is $450 sir because of your income.

Nice stir up. He stirred up the "tax the rich" crowd who don't think things through, right Mike?
BYU71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2007, 01:57 PM   #13
MikeWaters
Demiurge
 
MikeWaters's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,365
MikeWaters is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BYU71 View Post
I haven't read everything Buffet said, so I don't no if he stirred things up or you are. First off, what does the 33% tax represent.

If she had adjusted gross income and no deduction after that and was single and made $1,036,000 a year, she would be paying roughly 32.33%. If she is a receptionist and makes over $1,000,000 I don't feel too sorry for her. (this is based on the 2006 tax rate schedule I looked up). For a single taxpayer you don't even hit the highest marginal tax rate until $336,550 in income. That means you pay 35% on anything over that.

So I guess Buffet meant total taxes as a percent. Fed Income, State INcome, Property taxes, sales tax, gasoline tax, etc. Of course the rich pay a smaller percentage on all those taxes. When someone steps up and buys a gallon of gas do you think the gas tax should be a progressive tax too. Let's see, show me your income statement and we will let you know how much you have to pay in gas tax. Your sales tax on this banana is $450 sir because of your income.

Nice stir up. He stirred up the "tax the rich" crowd who don't think things through, right Mike?
Sorry that Santos stirred you up when he called you out about your ridiculous tax claims.
MikeWaters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2007, 02:07 PM   #14
BYU71
Senior Member
 
BYU71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,084
BYU71 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeWaters View Post
Sorry that Santos stirred you up when he called you out about your ridiculous tax claims.

Santos didn't stir me up. My claim was if I made any more money. I never said I pay 45% in income taxes. My claim was if I make another dollar, what would my tax be on that additional $. Obviously you don't understand how the progressive tax system works and marginal tax rates.

Federal marginal rate 35%, state of Utah rate 7.5%. Sure that is 42.5%. I am off by 2.5% You call that ridiculous?

Now, you could call bull shit and say I don't make that much money and I couldn't disprove you, because I am not going to show you any personal records to prove rather I do or don't.
BYU71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2007, 02:13 PM   #15
MikeWaters
Demiurge
 
MikeWaters's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,365
MikeWaters is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BYU71 View Post
Santos didn't stir me up. My claim was if I made any more money. I never said I pay 45% in income taxes. My claim was if I make another dollar, what would my tax be on that additional $. Obviously you don't understand how the progressive tax system works and marginal tax rates.

Federal marginal rate 35%, state of Utah rate 7.5%. Sure that is 42.5%. I am off by 2.5% You call that ridiculous?

Now, you could call bull shit and say I don't make that much money and I couldn't disprove you, because I am not going to show you any personal records to prove rather I do or don't.
So who pays more state and federal income tax? You or your receptionist?
MikeWaters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2007, 02:18 PM   #16
BYU71
Senior Member
 
BYU71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,084
BYU71 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeWaters View Post
So who pays more state and federal income tax? You or your receptionist?
OK, there is this fictional guy on the boards who calls himself BYU71. He is really a guy locked up in a mental institution who has access to a computer all day. This guy fantasizes about being someone else. I am sure that fantasy person exists someplace in real life so the numbers would be true for that person.

That person will be paying probably at least $70,000 in Federal and State taxes this year. His secretary doesn't make that much.

As a percentage of income, that person also pays more fed and state income tax than his secretary.
BYU71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2007, 02:20 PM   #17
MikeWaters
Demiurge
 
MikeWaters's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36,365
MikeWaters is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BYU71 View Post
OK, there is this fictional guy on the boards who calls himself BYU71. He is really a guy locked up in a mental institution who has access to a computer all day. This guy fantasizes about being someone else. I am sure that fantasy person exists someplace in real life so the numbers would be true for that person.

That person will be paying probably at least $70,000 in Federal and State taxes this year. His secretary doesn't make that much.

As a percentage of income, that person also pays more fed and state income tax than his secretary.
I wonder if Warren Buffet's receptionist makes more than hypothetical BYU71.
MikeWaters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2007, 02:22 PM   #18
BYU71
Senior Member
 
BYU71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,084
BYU71 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeWaters View Post
I wonder if Warren Buffet's receptionist makes more than hypothetical BYU71.
If she pays 33% in federal income taxes, she makes a hell of a lot more than the hypothetical BYU71.
BYU71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2007, 02:32 PM   #19
venomous viper
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Cancun, AZ, TX and CA.
Posts: 191
venomous viper is on a distinguished road
Smile good stuff!!

Your banter was fun to read, but the pictures were the best part of it. Just admit that the tax code and those than pay and those that don't is messed up and you'll hit the nail on the head. Everyone has the same right to adjust their affairs in such a way to pay the least possible taxes.(according to Judge Learned Hand of the supreme court MANY years ago)
venomous viper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2007, 01:32 AM   #20
Detroitdad
Resident Jackass
 
Detroitdad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Roswell, New Mexico
Posts: 1,846
Detroitdad is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by venomous viper View Post
Your banter was fun to read, but the pictures were the best part of it. Just admit that the tax code and those than pay and those that don't is messed up and you'll hit the nail on the head. Everyone has the same right to adjust their affairs in such a way to pay the least possible taxes.(according to Judge Learned Hand of the supreme court MANY years ago)
Learned Hand was never on the SUpreme Court, but point well taken.
Detroitdad is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.